Why the Federal Reserve Is A Threat to Little Old Ladies
71The Federal Reserve is a Threat to Little Old Ladies
Just remember, the consumer makes up for 70 percent of the US GDP. New 2010-2011 QE will result in possible inflated assets, with strapped consumers, including the little old ladies, pulling back in the face of inflated prices. Or, more likely, QE will not work and will just reveal the weakness in the US economy.
Update: The United States government debt will be in excess of 100 percent within 5 years, according to Bill Gross, manager of PIMCO funds. The danger of this massive debt is obvious. It could 1. weaken the ability of the US government to become free of moneychanger international banker debt or 2. cause a default of the United States, which could result in a currency devaluation and possibly a new reserve currency that is WORLDWIDE.
There are many east coast professors who want a one world currency. (See the link for "We Already Have One World Government" below.) The moneychangers will have absolute power once this is accomplished and they have near absolute power now. The cost to borrow money in the USA will SKYROCKET. Prosperity in the United States will become even more difficult to achieve, putting the country at risk.
Why would the federal reserve be a threat to little old ladies? Because they have decided to purchase treasury bonds out of money created from nothing. The ultimate immediate impact of these purchases is to:
1. give more business to the banks, as they will resell these bonds to the banks down the road, causing the national debt to rise. If they would just keep the bonds and return the interest to the US on a permanent basis it would cost the government less.
2. keep interest rates low, (since they have already driven short term rates to zero through monetary policy so they can do nothing there), and
3. worst of all, to debase the value of the dollar.
The first reason would be ok, except that makes banks less eager to loan. The second reason destroys the return on savings of the elderly. This is criminal theft, only the Fed can do it legally. The third reason, ie, the decrease the value of the dollar sets a dangerous precedent. The result is that already overpriced assets, such as cars, houses and food will not fall to fair value. Gas could go through the roof with a weak dollar.
All this will likely not be accompanied with appropriate wage increases or cost of living increases to the little old ladies of the USA which are generally capped This is, in effect, a tax, a market manipulation, a government interferance into the free market.
You are saying, "what else is new", but this is indeed new. The fed is not in the habit of debasing the currency of the United States in this fashion. What is happening is that the government prints treasury bonds. The fed prints money. Then they make an exchange, and the money that is used to purchase treasuries is not coming from production of goods and services.
Evidently, Bernanke and the fed just want to steal from the savings of the little old ladies, and then they want the same little old ladies to go out and buy a Mazerati or something on credit! Helicopter Ben is messing up the economy in very unpredictable ways.
If Americans start borrowing up to their eyeballs when they are already tapped out what good result can come of this?
Unintended Consequences of Helicopter Ben's Currency Debasement Policy
There are intended and unintended consequences of the policy to buy up bonds by the Federal Reserve Bank. The first, and maybe intended consequence, is that China will be happy for awhile because their bonds will be worth more, backed by Helicopter Ben's purchases of more of those bonds.
But remember, we would not have to be buying bonds if we weren't printing so many bonds because of our refusal to nationalize the banks. Our refusal to let the bondholders of the banks and insurance companies take shared pain and our continual raiding of the treasury to bail out the likes of AIG is making it necessary to buy these excess MBS, GSE and Treasury bonds, quelling our creditors' (like China) concerns.
There is a worry that there will be so many bonds coming onto the market that demand will dry up. While that is doubtful there could be softening of demand, ultimately defeating the aim of the Federal Reserve.
But there could be other unintended consequences. One unintended consequence is that inflation could rage in the near future causing those who buy houses at the new low rates to be trapped in their homes by massively rising interest rates. These high rates will be needed to stop the raging inflation that is most assuredly coming. America has not used these banana republic methods to spur economic "growth" in the past. This is a disturbing development.
I have been warning people not to buy houses because they are overpriced still, and now the added risk of higher interest rates in the future has become even more likely than before.
Warning, this effort to stimulate the housing market is a trap. It is no less of a trap than the trap of no doc liar and adjustable rate loans!! You have been warned!
Of course, if the stimulation of printing money doesn't work then we will be in even greater financial trouble sooner. The fed is at a crossroads. If they do not buy enough of the treasuries they will not be able to lower interest rates on 10 year bonds, the benchmark for fixed income mortgages. But if they now increase their purchases they will only temporarily be able to lower those rates, because inflation will rise as the ugly gorilla in the room.The fed is at a crossroads and I believe that they are boxed in.
Is Jim Rogers or Ben Bernanke right about the outcome of this currency devaluation madness?
See results without votingLinks to Bond and Inflation Information
- We Already Have One World Government
Update: On CNBC with Maria Bartiromo, Dr Robert Mundell has recommended replacing the dollar with a world wide currency controlled by the international monetary community. Seems there are a lot of professors... - Brace For Hyper-Inflation
Helicopter Ben talks a good game about how he's got it all under control. Don't believe him. * How the Fed prints money - Jim Rogers Blog
Investor information in perilous times. - http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/211510/Fed-Buying-Treasuries!-Stocks-Soar-Dollar-Tanks?
The Federal Reserve begins to buy MBA's and treasury bonds. - Option ARMageddon Blog Archive Fed to Buy Treasurys, Expand MBS purchases
Bernanke is pursuing a desperate and terrible monetary policy. - https://www.kitcomm.com/showthread.php?t=29244
Printing money is an artificial effort to boost an artificial economy.
Sobering Evaluation of Our Banana Republic Debt Explosion
My Seeking Alpha Economic Commentary
- Wrangling Over Income Inequality: A Comprehensive Review And Critique Of Robert Reich's Book 'Aftershock'
That is false, Bill. Even Barry Ritholtz agrees that the CRA was a small portion of the housing bubble, about 26 percent of subprime according to the Fed, and zero percent for jumbo and prime toxic loans. Did the CRA give the housing bubble a kickstart? Perhaps. But without the shadow banks being involved it would not have been a serious bubble.By far the most loans that juiced the bubble were made after 2003, and those were made by shadow banks, not the CRA who had pretty much pulled out by them. No, this was a basel 2 inspired scam, that used shadow banks like Ameriquest and Countrywide and laundered the bad loans through investment bank falsely rated CDO's. - 2 weeks ago
- Wrangling Over Income Inequality: A Comprehensive Review And Critique Of Robert Reich's Book 'Aftershock'
Try reading my ebook, Ponzi Housing Scheme 21st Century found on all major ebook stores. Or while you are at it, there is another smoking gun I just found. Read my article about how the easy money scam was imported from the UK and the City of London:http://read.bi/yIGm0xAnd don't pretend, Captain Ahab, that you don't understand this. - 2 weeks ago
- Wrangling Over Income Inequality: A Comprehensive Review And Critique Of Robert Reich's Book 'Aftershock'
Your statement has problems. First of all, the bankers started the housing bubble on purpose. Second, speculation in futures should be limited. These are not accidental schemes to scam money from main street. They are done on purpose. The author misses it completely. - 3 weeks ago
- Fighting back against U.S. and EU threats of further sanctions, Iran announces a large 10-day naval exercise that will see its warships clogging the Persian Gulf from east of the Strait of Hormuz to the Gulf of Aden. Oil is perky, but back below the $100/barrel it flew through on the announcement. USO +0.4%.
Yeah, add to that the churn of speculation, like a hidden tax, and oil is bound to be more expensive than the market would affix to it. But totally free markets don't exist. - 7 weeks ago
- Does the World Economy Have a Debt Wish?
If I had to choose I would trust the police over a criminal. - 7 weeks ago
- Does the World Economy Have a Debt Wish?
FDR taught people not to trust bankers. That alone made him immensely valuable in an age where the casino was rampant. - 8 weeks ago
Marc Faber on Economic Depressions
What do you think about our Banana Republic purchase of more bond debt?Loading...
It's amazing that BG would write a hub against the Fed - an accurate one - but then proceed to proclaim its innocence regarding the recent crash.
The Federal Reserve is a fount of credit, not of capital.
The loan suppose to be useful for people, which want to start their business. By the way, that is not hard to get a auto loan.
The Federal Reserve has got to go. In 2002 congressman Ron Paul gave a speech in the House of Representatives that asked for the Federal Reserve to be abolished.
Read the speech here: http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr09
The inflationary debt model has always worked against the people. Enslaving a society through debt is a power play. People need to wake the hell up and see what is going on. The Fed is the very reason we are in this crisis. Our currency is made up, fabricated, and backed by nothing. This is a very simple principal yet people are too stupid or uneducated to recognize it?
Want to know who really owns the Federal Reserve (It's not you the people and it's not the Federal Government)
















bgamall Hub Author 4 days ago
I believe that the Fed should be nationalized. I am not against liquidity as a concept. I am against the speculation that comes with allowing the banks to lever up their investments in commodities.
We also needed to temporarily nationalize the banks, clean them up and put them back into the private sector. But this cannot happen all at once as a massive run on the shadow money markets. This needs to happen one big bank at a time.